Over 2.5 goals
Best odds
1xBet1.74
1xBet1.74
Pinnacle1.72
Bet3651.70Archived odds
Loading match details…
Loading match details…
This content was machine-translated from the French version.
Norvège
Danemark
Timestamped proof
Over 2.5 goals
1xBet1.74Pinnacle1.72Bet3651.70Archived odds
Norway have home advantage at Ullevaal and a squad featuring several top-level attacking profiles, which could favor a direct approach and attacking pressure.
Read the full analysisNorway have home advantage at Ullevaal and a squad featuring several top-level attacking profiles, which could favor a direct approach and attacking pressure. The decisive limitation is the absence of a confirmed starting eleven, a known first-choice goalkeeper, current tactical data, and comparable form from Denmark.
For Norway, the matches recorded before this encounter include wins against Brazil (2-1), Côte d’Ivoire (2-1), and Senegal (3-2), as well as defeats against France (1-4) and England (1-2), in June-July 2026; the dates and venues are provided by the federation, but no xG, shot, or pressing data is supplied. Directly comparable recent form for Denmark is information unavailable.
The theoretical rest period is identical in this international window; the impact of travel is not documented.
The recent documented meeting is Denmark’s 3-1 victory over Norway on June 8, 2024, in a friendly at Brøndby Stadion. This precedent is more than two years old, did not concern the Nations League, and does not allow conclusions to be drawn about the current squads, coaches, or mechanisms.
The record also mentions 91 historical meetings, whose prédictive valeur is very limited.
No verifiable medical absences or suspensions were found for Norway or Denmark. The status of players who are merely doubtful, starting goalkeepers and last-minute absentees is information not available.
The absence of information does not confirm the absence of injured players.
Norway hosts the opening match of Group A4 and must then face Portugal at home three days later; the group also includes Wales, with the top two advancing to the quarter-finals, the third playing a relegation playoff and the fourth being relegated. Favorable scenario for Norway: home advantage and a squad including Haaland, Ødegaard, Nusa and Sørloth could support direct attacking play and hold-up play in the box, without confirming their starting status or the game plan.
Favorable scenario for Denmark: a block controlling the first passes, defending crosses and exploiting the space behind Norway’s full-backs could overturn this reading; this mechanism remains hypothetical due to a lack of dated tactical and lineup data.
| Team | FIFA | FIFA points | Prev. rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 1638 | 19 | |
| 21 | 1620 | 21 |
CoachS. Solbakken
CoachB. Riemer
Bench
| Player | Rating | G | A | SoT | Shots | Min | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 66 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 66 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 89 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Rating | G | A | SoT | Shots | Min | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 90 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 88 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 75 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 75 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 82 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 82 | 0 | 0 |
NorvègeDanemark
RecordNorvège · 2W · 0D · 0L
This fixture is over and appears in the public ledger with its result, even though no bet was recommended here.
