Over 2.5 goals
Best odds
1xBet1.96
1xBet1.96
Bet3651.91
Pinnacle1.88Archived odds
Loading match details…
Loading match details…
This content was machine-translated from the French version.
CrystalPalace
NottinghamForest
Timestamped proof
Over 2.5 goals
1xBet1.96Bet3651.91Pinnacle1.88Archived odds
Crystal Palace–Nottingham Forest looks evenly matched at Selhurst Park: Palace can benefit from home advantage and its previous attacking sequences, while Forest has a transition profile capable of exploiting opponents’ defensive uncertainties.
Read the full analysisCrystal Palace-Nottingham Forest looks evenly matched at Selhurst Park: Palace can benefit from home advantage and its previous attacking sequences, while Forest has a transition profile capable of exploiting opponents’ defensive uncertainties. The decisive limitation remains the absence of confirmed lineups and the degraded quality of availability information.
Before the match, Crystal Palace is coming off a 0-0 draw at Leeds on September 20, following 2-3 defeats against Ipswich, 1-4 against Manchester City and 0-2 at Everton, as well as a 3-2 win at Fulham. Nottingham Forest is coming off a 0-1 defeat against Coventry on September 19, following a 2-1 win at Aston Villa, a 0-0 draw against Tottenham, a 2-2 draw at Liverpool and a 0-1 defeat against Leeds.
Both teams are coming off a long international break between their last match and this one. No homogeneous and publicly verifiable xG, shot-volume or pressing indicator is retained.
The three recent documented encounters all ended 1-1: at Nottingham Forest on February 1, 2026, at Selhurst Park on August 24, 2025, and at Selhurst Park on May 5, 2025. These results suggest close contests, but their prédictive valeur is limited because the squads, coaches and season contexts may have changed.
Forest’s long unbeaten run mentioned by une source spécialisée is a secondary indication and does not constitute the main signal.
After five matches, Nottingham Forest are 13th with 5 points and Crystal Palace 15th with 4 points; however, the standings at kick-off will depend on the results of October 10. Palace scenario: the advantage of Selhurst Park and the goals already scored at Fulham and against Ipswich could favor quick attacks down the flanks and in transition, especially after Forest’s defeat to Coventry.
Forest scenario: the points won at Aston Villa and Liverpool, as well as Morgan Gibbs-White’s ability to create chances, could allow them to attack the spaces if Palace field a reshuffled défense or goalkeeper. Set pieces, pressing, and box defending are not sufficiently documented to be assessed.
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts | W | D | L | BP | BC | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | +8 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 5 | WWWWW | |
| 2 | 5 | +4 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | LWWWW | |
| 3 | 5 | +11 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 5 | WWDLW | |
| 4 | 5 | +6 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | WDDDW | |
| 5 | 5 | +4 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 3 | DWDDW | |
| 6 | 5 | +3 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 4 | WDWDD | |
| 7 | 5 | +3 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | WDDDW | |
| 8 | 5 | +2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | LDDWW | |
| 9 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9 | WLDWD | |
| 10 | 5 | -2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 12 | LDLWW | |
| 11 | 5 | -4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | LWLLW | |
| 12 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | DLDWL | |
| 13 | 5 | -1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | LWDDL | |
| 14 | 5 | -4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | LLDWL | |
| 15 | 5 | -5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | DLWLL | |
| 16 | 5 | -5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | WLDLL | |
| 17 | 5 | -2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | LDDDL | |
| 18 | 5 | -9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 10 | WLLLL | |
| 19 | 5 | -3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | DDLLL | |
| 20 | 5 | -6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | LDDLL |
CoachP. Sage
CoachO. Glasner
Bench · Out and doubtful
| Player | Rating | G | A | SoT | Shots | Min | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 72 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 83 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 83 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Rating | G | A | SoT | Shots | Min | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 83 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 90 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 66 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 72 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 72 | 0 | 0 |
Crystal PalaceNottingham Forest
RecordCrystal Palace · 0W · 3D · 0L
This fixture is over and appears in the public ledger with its result, even though no bet was recommended here.
