Tennis

Tennis sanctions two players and keeps a coach suspended

Professional tennis has added a new series of disciplinary decisions to its anti-corruption record. Two players, Russian Mark Kaufman and Serbian Luka Todorovic, have…

Share

Written with the help of artificial-intelligence tools and checked by automated controls.

Professional tennis has added a new series of disciplinary decisions to its anti-corruption record. Two players, Russian Mark Kaufman and Serbian Luka Todorovic, have accepted sanctions following breaches of integrity rules, while Croatian coach Marino Jakic remains provisionally suspended in a separate proceeding. The information is based first on the official communication from the International Tennis Integrity Agency, followed by consistent reports.

The subject is not spectacular because of the names involved, who belong to the margins of the circuit, but it is important for what it says about the monitoring system. The violations established do not concern only proven match-fixing acts. They also concern cooperation with investigators, reporting suspicious approaches, and access to the information necessary for an investigation. In the fight against corruption, these obligations are central.

The subject is not spectacular because of the names involved, who belong to the margins of the circuit, but it is important for what it says about the monitoring system.

Two accepted sanctions

Mark Kaufman, a 20-year-old Russian player, accepted an eighteen-month suspension and a fine of 5 000 dollars, part of which is suspended. The main reason communicated by the ITIA concerns a failure to cooperate in an investigation linked to possible corruption, notably his refusal to allow his phone to be examined. His suspension is counted from 24 December 2025 and is due to run until 23 June 2027.

Luka Todorovic, a 24-year-old Serbian player, for his part accepted a nine-week suspension and a fine of 10 000 dollars, also partially suspended. His case concerns a failure to report knowledge of or suspicion about corrupt activity, including a suspicious approach in 2023. His period of ineligibility began on 19 August 2026 and is due to end on 21 October 2026.

These two cases serve as a reminder that the regulations impose an active responsibility on players. Failing to respond to investigators or failing to report a solicitation may be enough to trigger a sanction. The message is clear: integrity depends not only on the absence of betting or manipulation, but also on the circuit’s ability to obtain reliable information.

Jakic remains provisionally sidelined

Marino Jakic’s case is taking a different path. The Croatian coach has been provisionally suspended since 24 June 2026 pending a full investigation into possible violations dating back to 2023. He challenged the measure, but the independent arbitrator handling the appeal upheld the suspension in August, considering that it was based on sufficiently substantial evidence at this stage.

A provisional suspension does not amount to a final judgment. It does, however, prevent the person concerned from participating in the competitive ecosystem while the proceedings continue. In tennis, this means not playing, coaching, or attending events organized or recognized by the major governing bodies, including the professional tours, the Grand Slams, and national federations.

A reminder for secondary circuits

These announcements concern figures little known to the general public, but they affect a sector particularly exposed: the lower tiers of professional tennis. Revenues there are more irregular, visibility is lower, and monitoring can sometimes be more difficult. Integrity bodies therefore devote part of their work to weak signals: unreported approaches, suspicious communications, and incomplete cooperation.

The immediate sporting impact is limited, but the institutional impact is not. By making these sanctions public, the ITIA seeks to maintain a deterrent effect and to remind everyone that the regulations follow players, coaches, and support staff even away from the major events. It is often in these less visible areas that the credibility of the system is decided.

Share
All news